Sloat v. Turner
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
*264OPINION
By the Court,
Zenoff, J.:
This appeal is taken from an inverse condemnation award granted to ihe appellants, plaintiffs below. The trial court found as a matter of law that appellants had prescriptively perfected an easement over property condemned by the state for purposes of erecting Interstate 15 and charged the state with *265compensation for this deprivation of access. Concurrently, it held the state liable to appellants for the reduction in market value caused by the completion of the freeway. Appellants’ only claim on appeal is for an increase in the allowance for attorney’s fees.
The…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Bacich v. Board of ControlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Albers v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
- Holtz v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Tripp v. BagleyUtah Supreme Court · 1928
- Ophir Silver Mining Co. v. CarpenterNevada Supreme Court · 1868
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Schwartz v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1995
- State ex rel. Nevada Department of Transportation v. Las Vegas Building Materials, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 1988