Legal Opinion

Reagan Et Ux. v. Reading Company

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 28, 1936No. Appeal, 298PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Rhodes, J.,

This is an action of trespass brought by Anthony Reagan and Edna P. Reagan, his wife, to recover damages for the death of their minor son, Robert, as the result of injuries received in an accident alleged to have been caused by the negligence of defendant. Defendant offered no evidence, and, after presenting a point for binding instructions which was refused, rested. The jury rendered a verdict in favor of plaintiffs. Defendant’s motion for judgment in its favor n. o. v. hav ing been refused, it appeals, assigning as error the action of the court below in refusing its…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Peden v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  2. Petrowski v. Philadelphia & Reading Railway Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
  3. Philadelphia & Reading Railroad v. SpearenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1864
  4. Cover v. Hershey Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  5. Piepke v. Philadelphia & Reading Railway Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1913

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Frederick v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  2. Commonwealth v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  3. Kuhl v. District Court of the First Judicial DistrictMontana Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Davies v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  5. Noonan Et Ux. v. Pa. Railroad Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API