Legal Opinion

Forest City Grant Liberty Associates v. Genro II, Inc.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 12, 1995PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WIEAND, Judge:

In this dispute over an insurer’s duty to indemnify, the principal issue makes it necessary that we construe a clause in the policy which requires the insured to “cooperate” with the insurer.

When the owners of the Liberty Center discovered defects in the roofing on their several buildings, 1 they commenced an action against Carlisle SynTec Systems, which had designed the several roofs, and General Roofing Company, which had installed the same. Joined as an additional defendant was RMax, Inc., which had supplied foam insulation for the project. It was alleged that the facer sheet…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United Services Automobile Ass'n v. MorrisArizona Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Ecksel v. Orleans Construction Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  3. Techalloy Co. v. Reliance InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  4. Miller v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  5. Cameron v. BergerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Koppers Company, Inc. v. The Aetna Casualty and Surety Company Zurich Insurance Company the Travelers Indemnity Co. The American Home Assurance Company Commercial Union Insurance Company the Home Insurance Company Underwriter's at Lloyd's of London. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London Certain Insurance Companies in the London Market, Referred to in This Action as "Jackson and Companies", ( Pursuant to Rule 12(a), f.r.a.p.) in No. 95-3432. Koppers Company, Inc. v. The Aetna Casualty and Surety Company Zurich Insurance Company the Travelers Indemnity Co. The American Home Assurance Company Commercial Union Insurance Company the Home Insurance Company Underwriters's at Lloyd's of London Certain Insurance Companies in the London Market, Referred to in This Action as "Jackson and Companies." ( Pursuant to Rule 12(a), f.r.a.p.) Koppers Company, Inc., in No. 95-3461Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
  2. SCW West LLC v. Westport InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2012
  3. Marion, D. v. Bryn Mawr Trust Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2021
  4. Mader, S. v. Duquesne LightSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  5. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. SteffenDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2013

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API