Miller v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Hoffman, J.,
This is an action in assumpsit to recover medical benefits allegedly due under the terms of a medical insurance policy. Appellant contends that the lower court improperly granted the appellee’s motion for judgment on the pleadings.
On November 2, 1972, the appellant, Harvey Miller, applied for a “Major Medical Expense Policy” with the appellee, The Prudential Insurance Company of America (Prudential). The application, filed with Prudential’s agent, Martin Birnbaum, required the applicant to disclose whether he was covered under other medical expense policies with…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Cadwallader v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
- Bata v. Central-Penn Nat. Bank of Phila.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
- Hionis v. Northern Mutual InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- GOLDMAN v. McShainSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
- Celley v. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'nSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by60 opinions
- Pacific Indemnity Co. v. LinnCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- Techalloy Co. v. Reliance InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Selected Risks Insurance Company v. Bruno, Anthony v. And Bruno, Lucy C., His Wife, and Bruno, Jr., AnthonyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
- Bishop v. WashingtonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Eichelberger v. WarnerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.