Legal Opinion
Engineered Products Co. v. Donaldson Co., Inc.
District Court, N.D. Iowa
Decided September 30, 2002No. C 98-2106-MWBPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT REGARDING DOUBLE PATENTING AND PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO REASSERT ’728 PATENT
BENNETT, Chief Judge.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I.INTRODUCTION.1073
A Procedural Background.1073
B.Factual Background.1075
1. The air ñlter indicator market.1075
2. EPC’s patents.1076
3. The stipulation regarding the ’728 patent.1079
II. DONALDSON’S SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION REGARDING
OBVIOUSNESS-TYPE DOUBLE PATENTING.1082
A. Timeliness of the motion.1082
1. Arguments of the parties.1082
2. Analysis.1083
a. The applicable standard.1083
b. Application of the…
2Cases cited56 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Amgen, Inc. v. F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2008
- Engineered Products Co. v. Donaldson Co., Inc.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 2004
- Engineered Products Co. v. Donaldson Co., Inc.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 2004
- United States v. JohnsonDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2002
- Janssen Biotech, Inc. v. Celltrion Healthcare Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2016