Legal Opinion
Janssen Biotech, Inc. v. Celltrion Healthcare Co.
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided September 29, 2016No. C.A. No. 15-10698-MLWPublished
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
Wolf, District Judge.
This Memorandum is based on the transcript of the decision rendered orally on August 18, 2016, allowing defendants Cell-*366trion Healthcare Co., Ltd., Celltrion, Inc., and Hospira, Inc.’s, Motion For Summary Judgment Of Invalidity Of Claims 1, 3, 5, 6, 7 Of The '471 patent For Obviousness-Type Double Patenting In Light Of The Claims In The ’95 And ’272 patents (the “Reexam Motion”). The Memorandum adds citations and some text, and clarifies some language.
I.SUMMARY
Plaintiffs Janssen Biotech, Inc. and New York University, (collectively “Janssen”), are the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Smith v. Stratus Computer, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
- Maymi v. Puerto Rico Ports AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2008
- Gorski v. New Hampshire Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.