Legal Opinion

Amgen, Inc. v. F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd.

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided October 2, 2008No. Civil Action 05-12237-WGYPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

WILLIAM G. YOUNG, District Judge.

Amgen Inc. (“Amgen”) sought declaratory relief to prevent F. Hoffmann-LaRoche Limited, Roche Diagnostics GmbH, and Hoffmann-La Roche Inc. (collectively, “Roche”) from marketing a drug that infringes U.S. Patent Nos. 5,441,868, 5,547,-933, 5,618,698, 5,621,080, 5,756,349, and 5,955,422. These patents relate to Am-gen’s recombinant erythropoietin (“EPO”), a naturally occurring protein that stimulates the production of red blood cells. Amgen, Inc. v. Hoechst Marion Roussel, Inc., 3 F.Supp.2d 104, 106 (D.Mass.1998). The jury found for Amgen…

2Cases cited81 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. New Hampshire v. MaineSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  4. Beacon Theatres, Inc. v. WestoverSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  5. Ebay Inc. v. Mercexchange, L. L. C.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006

76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Amgen Inc. v. F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
  2. In Re Enron Corp. Securities, Derivative & ERISA Lit.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2002
  3. In re Biogen 755 Patent Litig.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2018
  4. NewRiver, Inc. v. NEWKIRK PRODUCTS, INC.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2009
  5. Cummins-Allison Corp. v. SBM CO., LTD.District Court, E.D. Texas · 2009

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API