Hazelton v. First National Stores, Inc.
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtBranch, J.
In the eases of Mrs. Hazelton and the two children, the defendant’s motions for nonsuits should have been granted upon the ground that the statutory warranty of fitness did not extend to them. In the case of Howson v. Company, 87 N. H. 200, the question of the extent of such a warranty received careful consideration, and we there stated and applied the general rule “that warranties do not run in favor of any but an immediate purchaser.” It is true that, in that case, we were not called upon to decide whether, as an exception to that rule, a warranty of food known by the seller to be intended…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Rinaldi v. . Mohican Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1918
- Idzykowski v. Jordan Marsh Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
- Truslow Fulle, Inc. v. Diamond Bottling CorporationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
- Kennedy v. F. W. Woolworth Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923
- Skillings v. CollinsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Morrissette v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1974
- Whitfield v. JessupCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Baum v. MurrayWashington Supreme Court · 1945
- San Antonio v. Warwick Club Ginger Ale Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1968
- Klein v. American Luggage Works, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1960
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.