Legal Opinion
Lusk v. Bloch
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided May 22, 1917No. 8221PublishedCited by 4 opinions
Error from County Court, Oklahoma County; W. H. Zwick, Judge. Action by Abe Bloch,. Herbert R. Bloch, and Jacob Bloch, a copartnership doing business under the firm name and style of Abe Bloch & Co., against James W. Lusk and others, Receivers of" the St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad Company. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendants bring error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
HOOKER, C.
This case was iried upon the following agreed statement of facts:
“It is hereby agreed by and between the undersigned, attorneys for both plaintiffs and defendants, that if witnesses were produced in open court in this case the evidence would be as follows':
“That on the 15th day of February, 1914, Albert R. Lee, traveling salesman in the employment of plaintiffs, purchased a ticket for first-class passage over the lines of the defendants from Madill, Okla., to Hugo, Okla.; that the said Alb'ert R. Lee delivered to the said defendants at Madill, Oklá., for transportation to…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Alling v. Boston & Albany RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1879
- Stimson v. Connecticut River RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1867
- Brick v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
- Kansas City, M. & O. Ry. Co. v. FugattSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Wood v. Maine Central RailroadSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1908
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Burnett v. RiterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925
- Schuster v. N. & W. Railway Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1920
- Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. BonnerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Mayer v. Yellow Cab Co.Pennylvania Municipal Court, Philadelphia County · 1931