Kansas City, M. & O. Ry. Co. v. Fugatt
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Garfield County; James B. Cullison, Judge. Action by W. D. Fugatt against the Kansas City, Mexico & Orient Railway Company and another. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants bring error.
1Opinion of the CourtSharp, J.
For convenience the plaintiff in error Kansas City, Mexico & Orient Railway Company will be referred to as the Orient, and the St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad Company as the Frisco, and the defendant in error, W. D. Fugatt, as the plaintiff.
The action was brought by the plaintiff to recover damages for loss of time and expenses incurred on account of the alleged negligence of the railroad companies named in delivering to him at Enid two large sample trunks. On April 8, 1910, plaintiff, desiring to go to Longdale, a station on the Orient road, checked his sample trunks and telescope from…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Hannibal Railroad v. SwiftSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- Fleischman, Morris & Co. v. Southern Ry.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1907
- Cloe v. RogersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Ft. Smith W. R. Co. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Sloman v. . Great Western Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1876
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- All American Bus Lines, Inc. v. SchusterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1948
- Alton Railroad Co. v. Oklahoma Furn. Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
- Muskogee Electric Traction Co. v. EatonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Terrell Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- St. Louis-S. F. R. Co. v. FreemanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.