Legal Opinion
United States v. Edmond
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided August 22, 1989No. Crim. 89-0162PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
CHARLES R. RICHEY, District Judge.
The defendants have moved to suppress various wiretap tapes. With this memorandum and order the Court considers two components of that motion: (1) the request to suppress all tapes of conversations obtained pursuant to judicial authorization under 18 U.S.C. § 2511(2)(a)(ii)(A); and (2) the request to suppress all tapes recorded pursuant to the consent of a participant under 18 U.S.C. § 2511(2)(c). 1 The Court took evidence and heard arguments on the motions at various points during an omnibus motions hearing held August 3-9, 1989.…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Preston v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- United States v. GiordanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. TerryCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- United States v. Bonifacio De La Fuente, Ronald Albert Cardenas, George Sierra, Pat Vargas,augie D. Sierra, and Robert StewartCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- United States v. SalemmeDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1999
- Stewart v. StewartMississippi Supreme Court · 1994
- People v. RiveraSupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
- Montgomery v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006
- State v. LockeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1999
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.