Legal Opinion
State v. Locke
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided December 3, 1999No. 97-156PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBroderick, J.
In this interlocutory appeal, see RSA 606:10 (1986), the State challenges the Superior Court’s (Nadeau, C.J.) rulings that the defendant, Danny Locke, could not be charged as an accomplice to second degree murder, see RSA 630:l-b, 1(b) (1996); RSA 626:8, 11(c) (1996), and that evidence of an intercepted conversation between the defendant and his co-defendant should be suppressed based on New Hampshire’s wiretap statute, RSA ch. 570-A (1986 & Supp. 1999). We reverse and remand.
I
Viewed in the State’s favor, the record before us reveals the following. In June 1996, the body of Roland LaBranche…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Gerald Griggs-Ryan v. Beulah Smith, Gerald Griggs-Ryan v. Richard ConnellyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Frank John BonannoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
- State v. SterndaleSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1995
- United States v. Harold Glickman AKA Hal Glickman, United States of America v. James RoweCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
- State v. EtzweilerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1984
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. LockeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2002
- State v. NelsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
- State v. DonohueSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2003
- Locke v. CattellCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2007
- State v. AnthonySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2004
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.