Legal Opinion

Hillman v. Hastings Mut. Ins. Co.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 8, 1994No. 1992-2330PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 68 Ohio St.3d 238.] HILLMAN ET AL., APPELLEES AND CROSS-APPELLANTS, v. HASTINGS MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, APPELLANT AND CROSS-APPELLEE. [Cite as Hillman v. Hastings Mut. Ins. Co.,

1994-Ohio-527.] Insurance—Underinsured motorist coverage—Underinsurance claim must be paid, when. (No. 92-2330—Submitted December 14, 1993—Decided February 9, 1994.) APPEAL and CROSS-APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 92AP-717. __________________ Clark, Perdue & Roberts Co., L.P.A., and Dale K. Perdue, for appellees and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Savoie v. Grange Mutual InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1993
  2. In re Nationwide InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Hillman v. Hastings Mutual InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1994

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Girgis v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Cole v. HollandOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Am. States Ins. Co. v. RubinOhio Supreme Court · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API