Legal Opinion

Girgis v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 6, 1996No. 1994-2765PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 75 Ohio St.3d 302.] GIRGIS, APPELLANT, v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, APPELLEE. [Cite as Girgis v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.,

1996-Ohio-111.] Insurance—Uninsured motorist provision—R.C. 3937.18 and public policy preclude contract provision requiring physical contact for recovery—Test applied in cases where unidentified driver’s negligence causes injury is the corroborative evidence test. 1. R.C. 3937.18 and public policy preclude contract provisions in insurance policies from requiring physical contact as an…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Abate v. Pioneer Mutual Casualty Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1970
  2. United Services Automobile Ass'n AppealSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  3. Brown v. Progressive Mutual Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Florida · 1971
  4. Curran v. State Automobile Mutual Ins.Ohio Supreme Court · 1971
  5. State Farm Automobile Insurance v. AlexanderOhio Supreme Court · 1992

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Krantz v. PahnkeOhio Court of Appeals · 2022
  2. Friend v. Nationwide Mut. Ins., Unpublished Decision (12-31-2002)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2002
  3. Howard v. DodsonOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Ramsey v. Auto-Owners Ins. Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Rose v. City of Garfield Hts., Unpublished Decision (8-11-2005)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2005

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API