Legal Opinion
Vinson v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided April 8, 1936No. 25380PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMacIntyre, J.
1. The brief of evidence and the amended motion for new trial were not served on the solicitor five days before the hearing, as provided by the order taken in term, extending the time within which a brief of evidence and the amended motion might be filed; and upon the hearing of the motion in vacation, after having been thrice continued, there was no such abuse of discretion by the court, in dismissing the motion for new trial, as would require a reversal of the judgment. Lambert Hoisting Engine Co. v. Bray, 127 Ga. 452 (56 S. E. 513); Drew v. Drew, 50 Ga. App, 555 (179 S. E. 194) ; Bryant v.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Western & Atlantic Railroad v. Callaway, McCarty & GregorySupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
- Lambert Hoisting Engine Co. v. Bray & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1907
- Boatwright v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1892
- Eason v. Mayor of AmericusSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
- Bryant v. GraySupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Reserve Life Insurance Co. v. GayCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1959
- Carmichael v. City of JacksonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
- Satterfield v. FricksCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1958
- Smith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1952
- Montgomery v. Hardy Engineering & Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1962