Legal Opinion

Smith v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 6, 1952No. 34220PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarlisle, J.

A brief of evidence is essential to the validity of a motion for a new trial (Code, § 70-301; Herb v. Wolfe, 75 Ga. App. 20 (2), 41 S. E. 2d, 817; Dobbs v. Sims, 74 Ga. App. 1, 38 S. E. 2d, 680); and as the statute is imperative, not mentioning any excuse whatever, it contemplates that the movant can and must comply with its terms, irrespective of whether the official reporter has written out his report of the evidence or not (Vinson v. State, 53 Ga. App. 224, 185 S. E. 529); and where, on trial -and conviction of involuntary manslaughter, *704the defendant made a motion for new trial on October…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Herb v. WolfeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1947
  2. Vinson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
  3. Dobbs v. SimsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1946

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Satterfield v. FricksCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1958
  2. Montgomery v. Hardy Engineering & Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API