Legal Opinion

Lambert Hoisting Engine Co. v. Bray & Co.

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided February 14, 1907PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Motion for new trial. Before Judge Mitchell. Berrien superior court. September 29, 1905.

1Opinion of the CourtAtkinson, J.

On March 21, 1905, a motion for new trial was filed and an order granted setting the hearing for a day in vacation, the order allowing the movant until the hearing — whether upon the date named or upon a subsequent date thereafter fixed— to have a brief of evidence approved and filed. The hearing by subsequent orders' regularly granted was continued from time to time until September 29, 1905, the several orders preserving the rights of the parties as expressed in the original order. On the day last named, which was during a subsequent term of court, the •case was called, and there being no…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Western & Atlantic Railroad v. Callaway, McCarty & GregorySupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  2. Boatwright v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1892
  3. Eason v. Mayor of AmericusSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
  4. Bryant v. GraySupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
  5. Carter v. PittsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Blyth v. WhiteSupreme Court of Georgia · 1934
  2. Buchan v. WilliamsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1908
  3. Dykes v. BrockSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907
  4. Ward v. WardSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
  5. Reserve Life Insurance Co. v. GayCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1959

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API