Legal Opinion

Carmichael v. City of Jackson

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided September 18, 1942No. 14181PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bell, Justice.

1. “In all applications for a new trial the op posite party shall be served with a copy of the rule nisi, unless such copy is waived.” Code, § 70-306. The term “opposite party,” as used in this section, will include- all persons, if more than one, who were parties to the case and who are interested in sustaining the verdict. Code, § 102-102 (4); Hodnett v. Douglass, 124 Ga. 994 (53 S. E. 687). It is insisted by the plaintiff in error that the order upon which the intervenors stand appears to be a mere ex parte order granted at chambers, without notice to the defendant or his…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Woodbery v. Atlas Realty Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1919
  2. Delaney v. SheehanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912
  3. Schulze v. SchulzeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1919
  4. Smith v. Eubanks & HillSupreme Court of Georgia · 1884
  5. Southern Railway Co. v. FlemisterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Lawson v. HaygoodSupreme Court of Georgia · 1947
  2. Lester v. Crooms, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
  3. Morris v. BellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1959
  4. Almon v. Citizens & Southern National BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963
  5. State Highway Department v. RoquemoreCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API