Legal Opinion

In Re Estate of Barney

California Supreme Court

Decided April 12, 1923No. S. F. No. 10429PublishedCited by 11 opinions

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Santa Clara County denying application for letters of guardianship. F. P. Gosbey, Judge. Affirmed. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtWilbur, C. J.

The trial court having denied an application for letters of guardianship of the person and estate of Lydia H. Barney, a motion for a new trial of the matter was made in the trial court, and motions were made to vacate the order denying the letters of guardianship, and in various ways the trial court was pressed for a reconsideration of the decision. The trial court having adhered to its conclusion an appeal was taken from the order denying the application for letters of guardianship and various other orders denying the application for reconsideration of such decision. The respondent moves to…

2Cited by11 opinions

  1. Stenzel v. KronickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Bell v. BriganceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Bognuda v. PearsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
  4. Rubin v. Platt Music Co.California Court of Appeal · 1926
  5. Woods v. BerryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API