Microelectronic Systems Corp. v. Bamberger's
District Court, E.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
FEIKENS, District Judge.
Plaintiff, Microelectronic Systems Corporation of America [Micro], brings these diversity actions against defendants, Bamber-ger’s, a Division of R. H. Macy & Co., Inc. and R. H. Macy & Co., Inc. [Macy’s]. Plaintiff alleges that each defendant ordered and received shipments of certain electronic watches manufactured by plaintiff and that both defendants failed to remit the sums owing to plaintiff for their purchases. In each case suit is for the unpaid purchase price and is based on the alternative theories of account stated, breach of contract and…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Southern MacHine Company, Inc. v. Mohasco Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1968
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Chrysler Corp. v. Fedders Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981
- Wooldridge v. Beech Aircraft Corp.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1979
- American Business Overseas v. Methods Research Products, Inc.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1983
- First National Monetary Corp. v. ChesneyDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1980
- Frederick v. Hydro-Aluminum S.A.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1994
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.