Legal Opinion

Frederick v. Hydro-Aluminum S.A.

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided February 9, 1994No. 93-CV-70638-DTPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

JULIAN ABELE COOK, Jr., Chief Judge.

On September 14, 1993, one of the Defendants in the above-entitled cause, Eberhard Schmidt-Offhaus, filed a Motion to Dismiss against the Plaintiffs, John Frederick and Frederick Company, contending that the service of process upon him was invalid. On October 15, 1993, Schmidt-Offhaus and another Defendant, Hydro-Aluminum, s.a., filed a Motion to Dismiss, in which they jointly allege that this Court does not have *122personal jurisdiction over either of them.1 For the reasons that have been set forth below, this Court will (1) deny Schmidt-Off-haus’ Motion…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Solano Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Cargill Ferrous International v. M/V ElikonDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1994
  2. Amanda Hipple v. Marcia Erica EbanksDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2026
  3. Carter v. Louisville Metropolitan Police DepartmentDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2023
  4. Golden Star Wholesale, Inc. v. ZB Importing, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2019
  5. HPIL Holding, Inc. v. Haining ZhangDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2024

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API