United States v. Rice & Fielding, Inc.
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtHatfield, Judge
The merchandise involved in this appeal consists of camel’s-hair noils. It was assessed for duty by the collector at 45 cents per pound under paragraph 18 of the emergency tariff act of 1921. The importer protested the collector’s classification and assessment. The Board of General Appraisers sustained the protest and the Government has appealed from the judgment entered below.
It is contended bjr the appellant that this case is controlled by the decision of this court in the case of United States v. Rice & Fielding, Inc., 12 Ct. Cust. Appls. 78, T. D. 40020, in which case this court, upon the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Crimmins v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915
- United States v. Davies Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1922
- Hollender v. MagoneSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Wilson v. SpauldingUnited States Circuit Court · 1884
- United States v. HoganCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1924
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Mitsui v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1940
- Howard Young Galleries, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1936