Legal Opinion

People v. Myers

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 26, 1934No. Crim. 174PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarks, J.

Roy Myers and Scott Rackley were convicted of the crime of burglary in the first degree and, have appealed from the judgment pronounced upon them!' The appeal of Rackley has been dismissed (People v. Myers, ante, p. 380 [36 Pac. (2d) 410]), leaving that of Myers for our consideration.

Myers has appeared here in propria persona and presents the following grounds for a reversal of the judgment: (1) That the information does not charge a public offense; (2) that the evidence does not support the verdict and judgment; (3) prejudicial misconduct on the part of the trial judge.

The information which…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. People v. YeagerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  2. People v. SheldonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  3. People v. SquiresCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  4. People v. CuffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  5. People v. AroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1856

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. People v. SavageCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  2. State v. BlendtSuperior Court of Delaware · 1956
  3. People v. RiceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  4. Ex Parte RubensArizona Supreme Court · 1951
  5. People v. WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API