Legal Opinion

People v. Cuff

California Supreme Court

Decided December 8, 1898No. Crim. No. 473PublishedCited by 24 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Modoc County and from an order denying a new trial. J. W. Harrington, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtGaroutte, J.

The defendant has been convicted of a felony, alleged to have consisted in an attempt to kill one Miller by *591administering poison. The evidence is entirely circumstantial, but tends to show that defendant surreptitiously placed the poison, strychnia, in the sugar bowl out of which Miller was in the habit of using sugar, and out of which, in fact, upon this eventful day he used sugar, and nearly died as a result. The evidence is sufficient to support a finding of fact that Miller suffered from strychnia poisoning, and that defendant was the instrument by which it was administered. The case is…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kauffman v. MaierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  2. People v. O'BrienCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  3. People v. ThompsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  4. People v. DinsmoreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  5. People v. StreuberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. People v. RuefCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910
  2. Hirshfeld v. DanaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  3. People v. HightowerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
  4. Anderson v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1921
  5. People v. MestasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API