Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Rubens

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided November 26, 1951No. 5456PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LA PRADE, Justice.

This proceeding presents an appeal from an order of the Superior Court of Maricopa County denying the discharge of appellant on a writ of habeas corpus that had theretofore been issued for the purpose of inquiring into the legal cause for the arrest and detention of' appellant by the respondents below. By the response of Earl O’Clair, Chief of Police of the City of Phoenix, he admitted that appellant was physically confined in the city jail of the city of-Phoenix which was under his jurisdiction; alleged that he had had physical and legal custody of appellant under and…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Pierce v. CreecySupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. People Ex Rel. Hayes v. McLaughlinNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  3. Waller v. JordanArizona Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Ex Parte DavisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1933
  5. Ex Parte RiccardiArizona Supreme Court · 1949

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Applications of OppenheimerArizona Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Grano v. StateSuperior Court of Delaware · 1969
  3. State Ex Rel. Foster v. UttechWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
  4. In Re MartzIdaho Supreme Court · 1960
  5. State v. PhillipsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API