Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Arnold

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 21, 2007PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

JOHNSON, J.:

¶ 1 In this case, we consider whether police officers may justify the search of a casual visitor to an apartment based upon the claim that the individual searched lacked a reasonable expectation of privacy in the apartment. Here, police officers, solely to investigate a noise complaint, entered the apartment without a warrant and without probable cause and exigent circumstances. While in the apartment, the officers observed the Appellant, Lee Arnold, pass a marijuana pipe to another person. The Commonwealth seeks to justify the subsequent search of Arnold’s person based…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. EdmundsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  2. Commonwealth v. MillnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  3. Commonwealth v. RolandSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  4. Commonwealth v. GrahamSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  5. Commonwealth v. CorneliusSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BrownSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  2. Commonwealth v. BostickSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  3. Commonwealth v. FrederickSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  4. Commonwealth v. AntoszykSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  5. Commonwealth v. CarperSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API