Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Roland

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 4, 1994No. 55, W.D. Appeal Docket 1992PublishedCited by 75 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

FLAHERTY, Justice.

This is an appeal, by allowance, from a memorandum decision of the Superior Court which affirmed a judgment of sentence entered by the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County. The appellant, Dennis D. Roland, was convicted of furnishing liquor or malt or brewed beverages to minors, possession of a small amount of marijuana, and possession of drug paraphernalia. A fine of $250.00, plus costs of prosecution, was imposed.

Appellant’s convictions rested on evidence obtained when police entered his home, without a warrant, to investigate underage drinking.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Welsh v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Minnesota v. OlsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Arizona v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Commonwealth v. CortezSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by75 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. WrightSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  2. Commonwealth v. BrownSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  3. Commonwealth v. McCreeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  4. Commonwealth v. BostickSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  5. Commonwealth v. DommelSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005

70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API