Legal Opinion

Babayan v. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance Exchange

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided November 18, 1982No. Docket 60401PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam:.

Defendant appeals as of right from a judgment confirming an insurance arbitration award and asserts that the trial court improperly added interest and costs to the $20,000 maximum coverage award.

First, defendant contends that the trial court erred when it computed interest at 12% per annum from the date of the filing of the arbitration demand, under MCL 600.6013; MSA 27A.6013, rather than at 5% per annum from the date of the award, under MCL 438.31; MSA 19.15(1). We agree. The allowance of interest in general is statutory and the allowance of interest in arbitration awards is…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Dittus v. GeymanMichigan Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. Home Insurance v. RosquinMichigan Court of Appeals · 1979
  3. Osinski v. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance ExchangeMichigan Court of Appeals · 1976
  4. Borgess Hospital v. Berrien CountyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Stine v. Continental Casualty Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Morgan v. KamilMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. People v. GoeckermanMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. Sherman v. Michigan Mutual InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API