Legal Opinion

Dittus v. Geyman

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided April 6, 1976No. Docket 23372PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBashara, P. J.

The appellant, Michigan Mutual Liability Company, appeals from a judgment holding the appellant responsible for both prejudgment and post judgment interest on a verdict that was within the limits of a liability policy issued by the appellant.

This action arose when an automobile driven by the appellee, Marian Dittus, was rear-ended by a car driven by Robert Geyman. Marian Dittus sued for personal injuries, while her husband Richard, who is also an appellee, sought recovery for medical expenses and the loss of the services of his wife. At the time of the collision, Geyman was insured by the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Ballog v. Knight Newspapers, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Factory Mutual Liability Ins. Co. of Amer. v. CooperSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1970
  3. Vannoy v. City of WarrenMichigan Court of Appeals · 1970
  4. Cosby v. PoolMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971
  5. Waldrop v. RoderyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Guin v. HaAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co. v. MilneSupreme Court of Iowa · 1988
  3. Matich v. Modern Research Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Carney v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
  5. Union Investment Company v. Fidelity & Deposit Company Of MarylandCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1977

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API