Legal Opinion
Stine v. Continental Casualty Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided June 5, 1984No. 68720, (Calendar No. 10)PublishedCited by 91 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRyan, J.
The issue for which leave to appeal was granted in this case is the applicability of MCL 500.3008; MSA 24.13008 to the professional liability insurance policy issued to plaintiff by defendant. The Court of Appeals held that the cited statute is applicable to the insurance policy involved in this case and operates to provide coverage which, by the terms of the policy, would not otherwise exist. We hold that it is not applicable and reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals.
In addition, because of the manner in which the foregoing issue has been framed and addressed by the parties, we are…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. BarrySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Durant v. StahlinMichigan Supreme Court · 1965
- Wendel v. SwanbergMichigan Supreme Court · 1971
- Galkin v. Lincoln Mutual Casualty Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1937
- Bowen v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by91 opinions
- Klapp v. United Insurance Group Agency, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 2003
- A-18-14 Templo Fuente De Vida Corp v. National Union Fire Insurance Company of PittsburghSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2016
- Henderson v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1999
- Allstate Insurance v. FreemanMichigan Supreme Court · 1989
- Sparks v. St. Paul InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
86 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.