Legal Opinion

Great Divide Insurance Co. v. Carpenter Ex Rel. Reed

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided October 24, 2003No. S-9774, S-9843PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

A jury awarded compensatory damages of $1,540,000 and punitive damages of $2,600,000 against Great Divide Insurance Company on claims that it had breached its duties to its insured, Gowdy & Son, while defending a claim brought by Raymond Car*602penter. The five main issues presented in the appeal are:

1. Did the policy issued by Great Divide to Gowdy & Son cover the accident that resulted in injury to Carpenter?

2. Was the jury determination that Great Divide did not fulfill its legal obligations to Gowdy & Son in accord with the law?

3. Was the jury determination that Great Divide did not…

3Cases cited20 opinions

  1. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. GandyTexas Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Miller v. ShugartSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  3. State v. O'Neill Investigations, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1980
  4. United Services Automobile Ass'n v. MorrisArizona Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Glover v. Tacoma General HospitalWashington Supreme Court · 1983

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by35 opinions

  1. Allstate Insurance Companies v. Charles HerronCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  2. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. FreyerMontana Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Nunn v. Mid-Century Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2011
  4. Casciola v. F.S. Air Service, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Reust v. Alaska Petroleum Contractors, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2005

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API