Legal Opinion
Howard v. Christmas
Tennessee Supreme Court
Decided January 8, 1944PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Chambliss
We quote from appellants’ brief this “Statement of the Case”:
“Appellants on March 12,1943, filed a bill of complaint against the Mayor and the Board of Aldermen of the City of Harriman, Tennessee, attacking the constitutionality of city ordinance No. 548 passed by the Board of Aldermen, and approved by the Mayor, praying’ for a declaratory judgment, and an injunction pending the termination of this suit. The bill of complaint was later amended so as to make the City of Harriman a party defendant. The injunction was granted. The appel-lees demurred to the bill, and gave notice for a hearing on…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Wright v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1937
- Erwin Billard Parlor v. BucknerTennessee Supreme Court · 1927
- State Ex Rel. Saperstein v. BassTennessee Supreme Court · 1941
- State Ex Rel. Major v. CummingsTennessee Supreme Court · 1942
- Cravens v. Storie, MayorTennessee Supreme Court · 1939
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Gatlinburg Beer Regulation Committee v. OgleTennessee Supreme Court · 1947
- Grubb v. Mayor Aldermen, MorristownTennessee Supreme Court · 1947
- Sandford v. PearsonTennessee Supreme Court · 1950
- Barnes v. City of DaytonTennessee Supreme Court · 1965
- Ketner v. ClaboTennessee Supreme Court · 1949
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.