Legal Opinion

Workman v. Bryce

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 25, 1957No. 33477PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRosellini, J.

These are consolidated actions. In Workman v. Bryce et al., the plaintiff, a judgment creditor of the defendants Bryce, seeks to set aside a bill of sale given to the defendant Nessie Warshal Shindel, covering certain farm machinery and equipment located on a ranch in Sno-homish county belonging to the defendants Bryce, and to have the lien of her judgment declared superior to a mortgage on the ranch, held by the defendant Nessie Warshal Shindel. It was alleged in the complaint that the bill of sale and the mortgage were given to defraud the plaintiff, and that no valid or legal consideration…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Manello v. BornstineWashington Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Puget Sound National Bank v. MoreWashington Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Zent v. GilsonWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Yakima First National Bank v. PettiboneWashington Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Endicott-Johnson Corporation v. BloomWashington Supreme Court · 1933

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Casterline v. RobertsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
  2. Sparkman & McLean Co. v. DerberCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1971
  3. Davis v. NielsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1973
  4. Tacoma Ass'n of Credit Men v. LesterWashington Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Buckerfield's Ltd. v. B. C. Goose & Duck Farm Ltd.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1973

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API