Legal Opinion
Manello v. Bornstine
Washington Supreme Court
Decided May 21, 1954No. 32482PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHamley, J.
— In October, 1950, Douglas and Roma Born-stine, husband and wife, and Peter and Catherine Manello, husband and wife, entered into a copartnership agreement consisting of four separate interests, share and share alike, to operate the Mercer Island Cleaners.
On September 15, 1951, Douglas Bornstine went to a drug store near his home and complained that several people, including his wife, were planning to burn him in a bonfire. He was arrested by the police and placed in the mental ward at Harborview hospital. On September 26, 1951, while still confined at Harborview, he was consulted by Stuart…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Bowman v. WebsterWashington Supreme Court · 1953
- Foss v. CulbertsonWashington Supreme Court · 1943
- In Re the Estate of YandWashington Supreme Court · 1945
- Sander v. BullWashington Supreme Court · 1913
- Zent v. GilsonWashington Supreme Court · 1909
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Public Utility District No. 1 v. Washington Public Power Supply SystemWashington Supreme Court · 1986
- Cummings v. AndersonWashington Supreme Court · 1980
- Shew v. Coon Bay Loafers, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1969
- William Kenneth Katsaris, Sheriff of Leon County, Florida v. United States of America, and Leon CountyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982
- Sparkman & McLean Co. v. DerberCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1971
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.