Legal Opinion

Endicott-Johnson Corporation v. Bloom

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 19, 1933No. 24789. Department TwoPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Tolman, J.—

Respondent, as plaintiff, brought this action to recover for merchandise sold and delivered to the defendant Bloom. A writ of attachment was sued out and levied upon a retail stock of merchandise then in Bloom’s possession.

Shortly after the action was commenced, leave having been first obtained, a complaint in intervention was filed setting np that, some months prior to the bringing of the action, Bloom had executed and delivered a chattel mortgage to the intervener, which mortgage had been duly filed for record; that six hundred dollars only had been paid thereon, and something…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Shapiro v. WilgusSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. McAvoy v. JenningsWashington Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Turner v. Iowa National BankWashington Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Vietor v. GloverWashington Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Puget Sound National Bank v. MoreWashington Supreme Court · 1930

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Workman v. BryceWashington Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Douglas County Memorial Hospital Ass'n v. NewbyWashington Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Haskell v. PhelpsWashington Supreme Court · 1937
  4. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of Coeur D'Alene v. MarshWashington Supreme Court · 1943
  5. DOUGLAS ETC. ASS'N v. NewbyWashington Supreme Court · 1954

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API