Legal Opinion

Puget Sound National Bank v. More

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 6, 1930No. 22480. Department TwoPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFullerton, J.

— On January 8, 1928, the respondent, The Puget Sound National Bank, instituted the present action against the appellant, Bessie D. More, stating its cause of action as follows:

“II. That heretofore in that certain action instituted in this court wherein the plaintiff was the plaintiff and .Grlen E. More and E. E. Anderson and E. M. More and Mattie More, his wife, were defendants; the same being No. 60617, records and files of this court, 'the plaintiff recovering judgment against the said defendants.
“III. That thereafter plaintiff caused execution to issue upon the said judgment and the said…

2Cited by11 opinions

  1. Blumenstein v. Phillips Insurance Center, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Workman v. BryceWashington Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Bond v. WerleyWashington Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Endicott-Johnson Corporation v. BloomWashington Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Schanno v. PangleWashington Supreme Court · 1943

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API