State v. White
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the Court
*439Pearson, C.J.
Defendant, Rex White, was brought to trial and convicted of second-degree rape 66 days after his preliminary appearance. Because he was incarcerated during the entire period, he argues his CrR 3.3 right to a trial within 60 days was violated. We are forced to agree and, therefore, reversé his conviction.
To comply with the 60-day rule, defendant should have been tried on or before February 16, 1978. Instead, he was tried on February 22 and 23. The State concedes that CrR 3.3 was not followed,1 but contends defendant waived this violation during arraignment.
The Court: Mr. White, to…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited12 opinions
- State v. StrikerWashington Supreme Court · 1976
- State v. WilliamsWashington Supreme Court · 1976
- State v. LivengoodCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1975
- State v. FranulovichCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1977
- State v. PomeroyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1977
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. WhiteWashington Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. RaperCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1987
- Heaney v. Seattle Municipal CourtCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1983
- State v. VicunaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
- State v. VicunaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.