Legal Opinion
Heaney v. Seattle Municipal Court
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided June 22, 1983No. 11630-4-I; 11970-2-IPublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtScholfield, J.
The City of Seattle appeals a superior court ruling that Seattle Municipal Court Local Rule 2.01(c) 1 (LR 2.01(c)) is inconsistent with JCrR 3.08, 2 which resulted in the dismissal of a charge of driving with license suspended against Michael R. Heaney.
Robert G. Armour appeals a superior court ruling that his motion to dismiss a charge for driving while intoxicated was properly denied because good cause existed to try him outside the 60-day speedy trial time limits of JCrR 3.08, and that Local King County District Court Rule CT-11 3 is consistent with JCrR 3.08.
On May 28, 1981, Michael R.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. MacKWashington Supreme Court · 1978
- Ellsworth P. Taylor v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1956
- State v. WhiteWashington Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. BeckerWashington Supreme Court · 1951
- City of Tacoma v. CavanaughWashington Supreme Court · 1954
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- State v. ThomasWashington Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. NewtonWashington Supreme Court · 1987
- California Court Reporters Ass'n v. Judicial CouncilCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
- Abad v. CozzaWashington Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. ChavezWashington Supreme Court · 1988
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.