Legal Opinion

State v. Vicuna

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided November 3, 2003No. 50295-6-IPublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtColeman, J.

Tony Vicuna was convicted of delivery of heroin and possession with intent to deliver. On appeal, he claims that the trial court erroneously granted his attorney’s request to withdraw on the eve of trial due to an alleged conflict of interest where the record contains no evidence of an actual conflict. He further argues that dismissal is required because, without evidence of a conflict, the trial court abused its discretion by continuing his speedy trial date to allow new counsel to substitute.

We agree that the trial court’s inquiry was insufficient to determine whether an actual conflict…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. State v. CampbellWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  3. In Re the Personal Restraint of RichardsonWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  4. State v. WhiteWashington Supreme Court · 1980
  5. State v. HunsakerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1994

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. RamirezWashington Supreme Court · 2018
  2. State v. PierceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
  3. State v. ReganCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
  4. State v. ReganCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
  5. State v. ReederCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API