Legal Opinion
United States v. Alberto Paramo
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided August 6, 1993No. 92-1861PublishedCited by 93 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
COWEN, Circuit Judge.
Defendant Alberto Paramo (“Paramo”) appeals his conviction on five counts of money laundering in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2 and 1956(a)(1)(A)(i). Paramo claims that the evidence was insufficient to support the money laundering convictions, because it failed to establish that he conducted financial transactions with the “intent to promote the carrying on of ... unlawful activity” under section 1956(a)(1)(A)(i). Paramo also claims that the district court erred by denying him a downward departure for substantial assistance. A court ordinarily may not…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Bordenkircher v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Blackledge v. PerrySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. GoodwinSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Alabama v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by93 opinions
- Neal v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2004
- United States v. Michael Piervinanzi, Daniel Tichio, John M. Bookhart, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Rosalind K. Reed, Defendant-Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
- United States v. Samuel Manarite and Jeanne ManariteCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Bruce R. WEST, Sr., Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
88 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.