Legal Opinion

United States v. Samuel Manarite and Jeanne Manarite

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 15, 1995No. 93-10527, 93-10528PublishedCited by 94 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SNEED, Circuit Judge:

Samuel and Jeanne Manarite appeal their convictions for conspiracy, money laundering, and interstate transportation and receipt of stolen property. 1 They contend that the trial court erred in (1) denying their motions for judgment of acquittal, (2) refusing to instruct the jury on entrapment, (3) denying Jeanne Manarite’s motion to sever, (4) admitting evidence of Samuel Manarite’s parole status, and (5) assessing their sentences. We reverse the Manarites’ conspiracy convictions, vacate their sentences, and remand the case for resentencing.

I

FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS BELOW

This…

2Cases cited51 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Pinkerton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Huddleston v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Pereira v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  5. Schmuck v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by94 opinions

  1. United States v. Katherine PappadopoulosCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  2. United States v. Klimavicius-ViloriaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
  3. United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Steven B. Tencer and Ronald Lazar, Defendants-Appellants-Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
  4. United States v. CroftCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
  5. United States v. MajorsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999

89 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API