Legal Opinion
Cahoon v. Canal Insurance Co.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
Decided November 21, 2000No. COA99-1412PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HORTON, Judge.
Appellants contend that they complied with the provisions of N.C. Gen. Stat. § 58-35-85 in cancelling the policy issued to plaintiff Cahoon, and argue that the trial court erred in ruling otherwise. We agree, and grant summary judgment in favor of the appellants, Agency and Canal.
N.C. Gen. Stat. § 58-35-85 sets out the procedure for cancellation of an insurance policy by an insurance premium finance company:
When an insurance premium finance agreement contains a power of attorney or other authority enabling the insurance premium finance company to cancel any insurance contract or…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Pearson v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
- Grant v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1968
- Ingram v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969
- Unisun Insurance v. GoodmanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
- Graves v. ABC Roofing Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- INAC CORP. v. Underwriters at Lloyd's, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2001
- Daniel v. National Casualty InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2015
- Diaz v. SmithCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012
- Pinnacle Special Police, Inc. v. Scottsdale InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2009
- Universal Insurance v. PattersonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011