Ingram v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtBritt, J.
The first issue is whether Nationwide has stated a cause of action against Payment Co. We answer in the affirmative.
Unless required by Article 4 of Chapter 58 of the General Statutes, Nationwide was not required to give Wall notice of the cancellation, since, on this record, the cancellation was made at the request of Wall’s attorney-in-fact. Daniels v. Insurance Co., 258 N.C. 660, 129 S.E. 2d 314.
The case of Grant v. Insurance Co., 1 N.C. App. 76, 159 S.E. 2d 368, although an action between the judgment creditor of the insured and insurance company only and which dealt with a request for…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Gaither Corporation v. SkinnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- Daniels v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
- Clark v. Pilot Freight Carriers, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
- Grant v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1968
3Cited by7 opinions
- Olivine Corp. v. United Capitol Ins. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
- Cahoon v. Canal Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
- Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance v. Safeguard Mutual InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1981
- Olivine Corp. v. United Capitol InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 2002
- PRUDENTIAL PROP. & CAS. INS. v. Safeguard Mut. Ins.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1981
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.