Legal Opinion

Pinnacle Special Police, Inc. v. Scottsdale Insurance

District Court, E.D. North Carolina

Decided February 12, 2009No. 5:07-cv-00106PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

JAMES C. DEVER, III, District Judge.

Defendant Scottsdale Insurance Company (“Scottsdale”) filed a motion for summary judgment in this insurance coverage dispute with plaintiff Pinnacle Special Police, Inc. (“Pinnacle”). Pinnacle, through its attorney-in-fact Charleston Premium Finance Company, cancelled Pinnacle’s insurance policy with Scottsdale before certain events underlying a tort action involving Pinnacle arose. Thus, Scottsdale contends that it need not defend or indemnify Pinnacle in connection with the underlying tort action. Pinnacle responds that because Scottsdale failed to…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  5. Connecticut National Bank v. GermainSupreme Court of the United States · 1992

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Se. Pub. Safety Grp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API