Legal Opinion

Lima Oil & Gas Co. v. Pritchard

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 18, 1923No. 11728PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

LOGSDON, G.

All assignments of error in this case are comprehended under two propositions, which are thus stated in defendant’s brief:

“1. The statute upon which plaintiff bases the validity and subsistence of his lease is inapplicable to the facts of this case.
“(2) - The failure of the trial court to require Jacob Schneider, plaintiff’s co-owner of the lease, .and Phillip Strong, lessor of both plaintiff and defendant, to be brought in as parties to this suit, is error for which this court will reverse the judgment.”

Under the first proposition both parties d >- vote a major portion…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Kolachny v. GalbreathSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  2. Frank Oil Co. v. Belleview Gas & Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  3. Superior Oil & Gas Co. v. MehlinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  4. Garfield Oil Co. v. ChamplinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  5. New State Oil & Gas Co. v. DunnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Alfson v. AndersonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Nicholson v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  3. Godwin v. GerlingSupreme Court of Missouri · 1951
  4. Gard v. KaiserSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1978
  5. Sohio Petroleum Co. v. BrannanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API