Legal Opinion

Ohio River Pipe Line, LLC v. Gutheil

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided June 20, 2001No. 2000CA36PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Doan, Judge.

Plaintiff-appellant Ohio River Pipe Line, LLC (“ORPL”) filed petitions, pursuant to R.C. Chapters 163 and 1723, for the appropriation of easements in real property. ORPL sought to appropriate the easements across the properties of various defendants-appellees for the construction of an underground pipeline to transport petroleum products, such as gasoline, kerosene, jet fuel, and diesel fuel, from a refinery in Kenova, West Virginia, to Columbus, Ohio. Pursuant to R.C. 1723.01, a private company “organized for the purpose of * * * transporting natural or artificial gas, petroleum,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Alexander v. Buckeye Pipe Line Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
  2. State ex rel. Horwitz v. Court of Common PleasOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Cablevision of the Midwest, Inc. v. GrossOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Board of Education of the City School District v. Holding Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1971
  5. Ohio Power Co. v. DeistOhio Supreme Court · 1951

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re: Robert A. Alexander and Gloria J. AlexanderUnited States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  2. Sunoco Pipeline L.P. v. TeterOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
  3. Columbia Gas v. BaileyOhio Court of Appeals · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API