Legal Opinion

Cablevision of the Midwest, Inc. v. Gross

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided October 19, 1994No. 92-1820PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoyer, C.J.

This case presents the court with two interrelated issues. First, we must decide whether Cablevision is a communications business under R.C. 4931.11, thereby entitling it to exercise the power of eminent domain described in R.C. 4931.04. Second, in the event we answer the first issue in the negative, we must decide whether the city of North Royalton, which possesses the power of eminent domain as an Ohio municipality, validly delegated that power to Cable-*544vision, a cable television franchisee, for the purpose of providing cable television service to residents of the municipality. Because we…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Seeley v. Expert, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Board of Education v. Fulton County Budget CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Radio Relay Corp. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1976

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. State v. YarbroughOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Sutowski v. Eli Lilly & Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Clark v. ScarpelliOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Sunoco Pipeline L.P. v. TeterOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
  5. State ex rel. Huron County Prosecutor v. WesterholdOhio Supreme Court · 1995

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API