Ohio Power Co. v. Deist
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMiddleton, J.
The specific question now before this court is: Does The Ohio Power Company have the right under the statutes, particularly Section 9192-1, General Code, and under the facts presented in the record, to appropriate a right of way for the purpose of constructing thereon a belt conveyor to transport coal from plaintiff’s coal field to its generating station, a distance of approximately four miles?
The decision of this case requires a construction of Sections 9192-1 and 11046, General Code, and their application to the facts and circumstances established by the evidence.
Section 9192-1, General…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Strickley v. Highland Boy Gold Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Wilton v. County St. JohnsSupreme Court of Florida · 1929
- Northwestern Telephone Exchange Co. v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1899
- Highland Boy Gold Mining Co. v. StrickleyUtah Supreme Court · 1904
- Davis v. Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1934
3Cited by11 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Department of Highways v. BradfordSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1962
- Sunoco Pipeline L.P. v. TeterOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
- Smith v. GilbraithOhio Court of Appeals · 1991
- Seadade Industries, Inc. v. Florida Power & Light Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1970
- Lamb v. Armco, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1986
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.