Legal Opinion

People v. Isham

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided November 24, 1995No. 94CA1388PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge DAVIDSON.

In this appeal from the denial of his motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Crim.P. 35(c), defendant, Donald Keith Isham, claims that ineffective assistance of counsel rendered his guilty plea invalid, that the coercive effect of his plea agreement rendered his guilty plea involuntary, and that his right to continued representation by appointed counsel was violated when the court arbitrarily disqualified his counsel of choice. He therefore contends that his guilty plea must be vacated. We affirm.

Defendant and his father each were charged with first degree…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. McMann v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Tollett v. HendersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. People v. ArguelloSupreme Court of Colorado · 1989

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. People v. MunseyColorado Court of Appeals · 2009
  2. People v. HarlanSupreme Court of Colorado · 2002
  3. People v. LopezColorado Court of Appeals · 2000
  4. People v. StovallColorado Court of Appeals · 2012
  5. People v. NeuhausColorado Court of Appeals · 2009

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API