Legal Opinion
People v. Stovall
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided January 19, 2012No. 09CA0487PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge ROY.
T1 Joel Matthew Stovall, defendant, appeals the trial court's orders denying his Crim. P. 35(a) and Crim. P. 35(c) motions. We affirm.
12 Specifically, defendant contends that (1) his plea was not knowing or voluntary because of the ineffective assistance of plea counsel; (2) the trial court erred in coneclud-ing that he was time-barred from challenging his non-class 1 felony convictions; and (8) his sentences were illegal because they required inconsistent findings of fact.
*153I. Claims Not Preserved
3 Defendant has asserted three claims of ineffective assistance of plea…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- McMann v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Tollett v. HendersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- William J. Hunsaker, Jr. v. The People of the State of ColoradoSupreme Court of Colorado · 2021
- People v. Campos-CoronaColorado Court of Appeals · 2013
- People v. DavisColorado Court of Appeals · 2018
- William J. HUNSAKER, Jr. v. The PEOPLE of the State of ColoradoSupreme Court of Colorado · 2021
- State v. VillegasCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2018
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.